DUK · rate-regulated utility · book-value and yield view
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK): Valuation Snapshot
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is a rate-regulated utility, and a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong lens for one, so TickerWorth does not publish a DCF fair value for it. What its filings and market data do show is below. Snapshot as of Oct 19, 2026.
Model by Miraaj Patel · generated from public market data · Updated Oct 19, 2026 · How these pages are made
Why is there no fair value for DUK?
This is a rate-regulated utility. Its returns are set by a regulator on an approved rate base rather than won in a market, so a free-cash-flow DCF is the wrong lens — heavy ongoing capex is the business model, not a cash-flow problem. We show the regulated-asset lenses — book value, earnings and dividend — instead.
What is DUK's TickerWorth Score?
Middle of the pack — real strengths and real weaknesses
Compared with Utilities companies in US
Its strongest point: a profitable, high-quality business. Its weakest: trades above our estimate of what it's worth.
- Value · 65 of 100
Cheaper than 65% of Utilities companies in US
- Price vs worth · 30 of 100
- Quality · 70 of 100
More profitable than 70% of Utilities companies in US
- Financial health · 42 of 100
Financially stronger than 42% of Utilities companies in US
- Growth · 32 of 100
Growing faster than 32% of Utilities companies in US
- Momentum · 54 of 100
Outperformed 54% of Utilities companies in US over the past year
Confidence: High confidence · Scored
Get the Undervalued Company of the Week.
- Price
- $121.47
- Market cap
- $94,
710, 431, 744 - 52-week high
- $134.49
- 52-week low
- $112.40
- Currency
- USD
- Exchange
- NYSE
Snapshot of Oct 19, 2026, quote time not published · Prices are delayed.
What we can say
Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is a rate-regulated utility, and a free-cash-flow discounted-cash-flow (DCF) model is structurally the wrong lens for one. Its returns are not won in a market — a regulator sets them on an approved rate base — and the heavy, permanent capital spending that depresses its free cash flow is the business model rather than a problem with it. We have the data to print a DCF number for DUK; we don't publish one because the model's assumptions don't describe how this company actually earns. What follows is the lenses that do — descriptive, not a valuation, and not investment advice.
Read the full reasoning
On the numbers we do have, DUK trades at a recent price of $121.47, a market capitalisation of about $94,710,431,744, sitting 41% of the way up its 52-week range ($112.40–$134.49), on the NYSE.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing DUK's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives P/E of 18.3× (cheaper than the peer median of 22.0×); Fwd P/E of 16.9× (in line with the peer median of 18.4×); P/B of 1.8× (cheaper than the peer median of 2.4×); P/S of 2.9× (cheaper than the peer median of 3.3×); EV/EBITDA of 11.4× (cheaper than the peer median of 13.7×); Dividend yield of 3.6% (cheaper than the peer median of 3.2%). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. DUK shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 1.76 and book value of $68.95 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. DUK is in a mixed trend, trading -9.7% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is -5.8%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
To be exact about what this page is not: we are not saying the numbers for DUK are unavailable. They are, and they are above. We are saying a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong instrument for this kind of business, and publishing one anyway — because the inputs happen to exist — would be a precise answer to the wrong question. Refusing is the more useful answer, and it is the same rule we apply to every name in this category.
DUK vs peers
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
| Multiple | DUK | Peer median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 18.3× | 22.0× | cheaper than |
| Fwd P/E | 16.9× | 18.4× | in line with |
| P/B | 1.8× | 2.4× | cheaper than |
| P/S | 2.9× | 3.3× | cheaper than |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× | 13.7× | cheaper than |
| Dividend yield | 3.6% | 3.2% | cheaper than |
What does Duke Energy Corporation do?
What does it do?
Duke Energy Corporation, through its subsidiaries, operates as an energy company in the United States. The company operates through two segments: Electric Utilities and Infrastructure (EU&I); and Gas Utilities and Infrastructure (GU&I). It operates in the Utilities - Regulated Electric industry (Utilities sector), headquartered in United States. The company employs roughly 26,441 people.
How does it make money?
The business turns $31.7B in annual revenue into profit. Out of every $100 of sales, about $28 is left as operating profit (operating margin of 27.5%), after a 52% gross margin on the products/services it sells. After all costs, taxes and interest, 16.0% of revenue becomes bottom-line net profit.
Is it financially healthy?
Financially it looks stretched: carries moderate debt (1.6× equity), may struggle to cover its short-term bills (0.7× current ratio), and is currently profitable.
Who at DUK filed insider trades?
| Date | Insider | Relationship | What happened | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weintraub Alexander J. | EVP, Chief Customer Officer | Code I | $48,781.14 | Form 4 for Weintraub Alexander J. (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| CRAVER THEODORE F JR | Director | Gift | — | Form 4 for CRAVER THEODORE F JR (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Renjel Louis E. | EVP&CEO DEF&MW&ChiefCorpAffOff | Open-market sale | $438,025.00 | Form 4 for Renjel Louis E. (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Sideris Harry K. | Director, President, CEO | Open-market sale | $2,487,400.00 | Form 4 for Sideris Harry K. (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| DORSA CAROLINE | Director | Grant / award | $200,041.74 | Form 4 for DORSA CAROLINE (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Herron John T | Director | Grant / award | $200,041.74 | Form 4 for Herron John T (opens sec.gov in a new tab) |
A disclosure, not a signal to trade. Source: SEC EDGAR (Form 4). Older filings and the 90-day buying-and-selling read are part of Pro. See plans
Companies we do put a number on
Not investment advice. TickerWorth Score is a model output.
A descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is not a licensed investment adviser, and these figures are estimates from public market data that can be wrong, stale or incomplete.