L · bank / insurer · bank model (justified price-to-book)
Loews Corporation (L): Valuation Snapshot
Loews Corporation (L) is a bank, insurer or other financial, and a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong lens for one, so TickerWorth does not publish a DCF fair value for it. Its bank model puts it at about $127.17 a share against $109.69. Snapshot as of Oct 19, 2026.
Model by Miraaj Patel · generated from public market data · Updated Oct 19, 2026 · How these pages are made
How is a bank like L valued?
This is a bank / insurer / financial. A free-cash-flow DCF is structurally the wrong lens here (their debt and float are raw material, not financing), so we don't publish one. Instead we value it with a bank model — justified price-to-book, (ROE − g) ÷ (cost of equity − g), on a return on equity of 9.3% and a cost of equity of 7.5% — at about $127.17 a share ($106.01–$158.88 for a cost of equity one point either way), against a price of $109.69.
A dividend-discount cross-check gives about $5.11, shown as a reference only. Every input is listed with its source; it is a model estimate, not a price target.
Bank model (justified price-to-book)
Our bank model’s estimate: about $127.17 (range $106.01 to $158.88), against a price of $109.69. It is not a DCF and not a price target.
Value = book value per share × (ROE − g) ÷ (cost of equity − g). The range is for a cost of equity ±1% (6.5%–8.5%).
| Input | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Book value per share | $93.52 | yfinance, latest reported book value per share |
| Return on equity | 9.3% | yfinance, trailing twelve months |
| Risk-free rate | 5.1% | US 10-year Treasury yield (^TNX) |
| Beta | 0.50× | yfinance 5-year monthly beta vs the S&P 500 |
| Equity risk premium | 4.7% | house equity risk premium (same as every DCF) |
| Cost of equity | 7.5% | computed — risk-free + beta × equity risk premium (CAPM) |
| Payout ratio | 3.1% | yfinance payout ratio (trailing dividends ÷ earnings) |
| Long-run growth | 2.5% | ESTIMATEROE × retention (9.0%), capped at the house long-run rate 2.5% |
| Justified price-to-book | 1.36× | computed — (ROE − g) ÷ (cost of equity − g) |
Dividend-discount cross-check: about $5.11, reference only — a low payout means most of the return comes from buybacks and retained growth, which a dividend model cannot see.
A model estimate from public data, with every input shown — not a price target and not advice. Bank returns on equity revert over time and this model holds today's for good.
When we tested this family of bank models on past data, none ranked banks better than plain price-to-book. Treat it as one formula's estimate, not a verdict.
What is L's TickerWorth Score?
Middle of the pack — real strengths and real weaknesses
Compared with Financial Services companies in US
Its strongest point: trades below our estimate of what it's worth. Its weakest: profitability is weak.
- Value · 69 of 100
Cheaper than 69% of Financial Services companies in US
- Price vs worth · 100 of 100
- Quality · 22 of 100
More profitable than 22% of Financial Services companies in US
- Financial health · 38 of 100
Financially stronger than 38% of Financial Services companies in US
- Growth · 23 of 100
Growing faster than 23% of Financial Services companies in US
- Momentum · 52 of 100
Outperformed 52% of Financial Services companies in US over the past year
Confidence: Low confidence · Scored
Get the Undervalued Company of the Week.
- Price
- $109.69
- Market cap
- $22,
423, 676, 928 - 52-week high
- $121.01
- 52-week low
- $97.38
- Currency
- USD
- Exchange
- NYSE
Snapshot of Oct 19, 2026, quote time not published · Prices are delayed.
What we can say
Loews Corporation (L) is a bank, insurer or other financial, and a free-cash-flow discounted-cash-flow (DCF) model is structurally the wrong lens for it: for these businesses debt and float are raw material, not financing. So we value it the way a bank is valued — on the return it earns on its book equity. Our bank model (justified price-to-book) puts it at about $127.17 a share, between $106.01 and $158.88 for a cost of equity one point either side of 7.5%, against $109.69 today.
Read the full reasoning
Every input is listed with its source. It is a model estimate, not a price target, and not investment advice.
On the numbers we do have, L trades at a recent price of $109.69, a market capitalisation of about $22,423,676,928, sitting 52% of the way up its 52-week range ($97.38–$121.01), on the NYSE.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing L's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives P/E of 13.4× (in line with the peer median of 14.2×); Fwd P/E of 37.8× (richer than the peer median of 13.3×); P/B of 1.2× (cheaper than the peer median of 2.6×); P/S of 1.2× (cheaper than the peer median of 4.7×); Dividend yield of 0.2% (richer than the peer median of 1.9%). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. L shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 1.17 and book value of $93.52 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. L is in a mixed trend, trading -9.4% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is +11.4%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
To be exact about what this page is not: we are not saying the numbers for L are unavailable. They are, and they are above. We are saying a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong instrument for this kind of business, and publishing one anyway — because the inputs happen to exist — would be a precise answer to the wrong question. Refusing is the more useful answer, and it is the same rule we apply to every name in this category.
L vs peers
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
| Multiple | L | Peer median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 13.4× | 14.2× | in line with |
| Fwd P/E | 37.8× | 13.3× | richer than |
| P/B | 1.2× | 2.6× | cheaper than |
| P/S | 1.2× | 4.7× | cheaper than |
| Dividend yield | 0.2% | 1.9% | richer than |
What does Loews Corporation do?
What does it do?
Loews Corporation, through its subsidiaries, provides commercial property and casualty insurance in the United States and internationally. The company offers specialty insurance products, such as management and professional liability and other coverage products; surety and fidelity bonds; professional liability coverages and risk management services to various professional firms, including architects, real estate agents, and accounting and law firms; standard and excess property, marine and boiler, machinery coverages, workers' compensation, general and product liability, commercial auto, umbrella, excess and surplus coverages, specialized loss-sensitive insurance programs, total risk management services relating to claim and information services; directors and officers, errors and omissions, employment practices, fiduciary, fidelity, and cyber coverages, as well as for small and mid-size firms, public and privately held firms, and not-for-profit organizations; and insurance products to serve the health care industry, including professional and general liability, as well as associated casualty coverage to aging services, allied medical facilities, dentists, physicians, nurses, and other medical practitioners. It operates in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry (Financial Services sector), headquartered in United States. The company employs roughly 13,100 people.
How does it make money?
The business turns $18.7B in annual revenue into profit. Out of every $100 of sales, about $15 is left as operating profit (operating margin of 14.5%), after a 36% gross margin on the products/services it sells. After all costs, taxes and interest, 9.0% of revenue becomes bottom-line net profit.
Is it financially healthy?
Financially it looks mixed: carries modest debt (0.4× equity), may struggle to cover its short-term bills (0.5× current ratio), and is currently profitable.
Who at L filed insider trades?
| Date | Insider | Relationship | What happened | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TISCH JAMES S | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for TISCH JAMES S (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| VanBelle Jennifer | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for VanBelle Jennifer (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Robusto Dino | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Robusto Dino (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Peters Susan | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Peters Susan (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Locker Jonathan C | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Locker Jonathan C (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| HARRIS WALTER L | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for HARRIS WALTER L (opens sec.gov in a new tab) |
A disclosure, not a signal to trade. Source: SEC EDGAR (Form 4). Older filings and the 90-day buying-and-selling read are part of Pro. See plans
Companies we do put a number on
Not investment advice. TickerWorth Score is a model output.
A descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is not a licensed investment adviser, and these figures are estimates from public market data that can be wrong, stale or incomplete.