NN Group N.V. (NN.AS) — Valuation Snapshot
Updated Sep 3, 2026 · bank / insurer · relative-multiples view · descriptive, not a DCF, not advice
NN Group N.V. (NN.AS) is a bank, insurer or other financial, and a free-cash-flow discounted-cash-flow (DCF) model is structurally the wrong lens for it: for these businesses debt and float are raw material, not financing, so there is no meaningful 'free cash flow' to discount. Instead of a misleading intrinsic-value number, this page reads NN.AS the way financials are actually valued — on relative multiples such as price-to-earnings and, above all, price-to-book — plus a plain description of where the stock trades. It is a descriptive snapshot, not a valuation, and not investment advice.
On the numbers we do have, NN.AS trades at a recent price of €78.34, a market capitalisation of about €20,371,406,848, sitting 81% of the way up its 52-week range (€56.48–€83.40), on the Amsterdam.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing NN.AS's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives P/E of 11.6× (cheaper than the peer median of 15.5×); Fwd P/E of 8.8× (cheaper than the peer median of 14.2×); P/B of 1.0× (cheaper than the peer median of 2.8×); P/S of 1.5× (cheaper than the peer median of 5.1×); EV/EBITDA of -6.6× (cheaper than the peer median of 23.3×); Dividend yield of 5.2% (cheaper than the peer median of 1.7%). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. NN.AS shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 0.98 and book value of €80.29 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. NN.AS is in an up-trend (price above both its 50- and 200-day averages), trading -6.1% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is +36.2%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
To be exact about what this page is not: we are not saying the numbers for NN.AS are unavailable. They are, and they are above. We are saying a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong instrument for this kind of business, and publishing one anyway — because the inputs happen to exist — would be a precise answer to the wrong question. Refusing is the more useful answer, and it is the same rule we apply to every name in this category.
Relative valuation — NN.AS vs peers
| Multiple | NN.AS | Peer median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 11.6× | 15.5× | cheaper than |
| Fwd P/E | 8.8× | 14.2× | cheaper than |
| P/B | 1.0× | 2.8× | cheaper than |
| P/S | 1.5× | 5.1× | cheaper than |
| EV/EBITDA | -6.6× | 23.3× | cheaper than |
| Dividend yield | 5.2% | 1.7% | cheaper than |
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
Asset / book-value view
Below book (P/B < 1) can flag either a discount to net assets or the market pricing in trouble — it is descriptive, not a buy signal.
Price-based snapshot
Price-based, not a valuation. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded — they say nothing about fair value.
Explore more
Most undervalued stocks (per our valuation) · All valued stocks · Interactive NN.AS viewA descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is an educational tool, not a licensed investment adviser. Figures are estimates derived from public market data and can be wrong, stale or incomplete.