PSQL · available-data snapshot
Pasqal Holding SA (PSQL): Available-Data Snapshot
TickerWorth does not publish a DCF fair value for Pasqal Holding SA (PSQL); the reason is set out below. What its filings and market data do show is below. The snapshot also sets out its trading multiples against 5 peers. Snapshot as of Oct 19, 2026.
Model by Miraaj Patel · generated from public market data · Updated Oct 19, 2026 · How these pages are made
Why is there no fair value for PSQL?
We do not publish a fair value for Pasqal Holding SA. What we can say from its filings and market data is below.
What is PSQL's TickerWorth Score?
Scores lower than almost every company we compare it with
Compared with Technology companies in US
Its weakest point: looks expensive on the numbers.
- Value · 8 of 100
Cheaper than 8% of Technology companies in US
- Price vs worth · 0 of 100
- Quality · 20 of 100
More profitable than 20% of Technology companies in US
- Financial health · 7 of 100
Financially stronger than 7% of Technology companies in US
- Growth · — of 100
- Momentum · 4 of 100
Outperformed 4% of Technology companies in US over the past year
Confidence: Medium confidence · Scored
Get the Undervalued Company of the Week.
- Price
- $5.87
- Market cap
- $1,
246, 163, 968 - 52-week high
- $24.69
- 52-week low
- $5.55
- Currency
- USD
- Exchange
- NasdaqGM
Snapshot of Oct 19, 2026, quote time not published · Prices are delayed.
What we can say
We don't publish a discounted-cash-flow fair value for Pasqal Holding SA (PSQL) because the free data sources we rely on don't expose the multi-year financials a DCF needs — common for small or thinly-covered listings. Rather than invent numbers, this page shows an honest snapshot of what the public data does support: the current price and size, any relative valuation multiples that exist, a book-value view, and a price-based read. Treat it as a descriptive starting point, not a valuation and not investment advice.
Read the full reasoning
On the numbers we do have, PSQL trades at a recent price of $5.87, a market capitalisation of about $1,246,163,968, sitting 2% of the way up its 52-week range ($5.55–$24.69), on the NasdaqGM.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing PSQL's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives P/S of 52.6× (richer than the peer median of 11.8×). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. PSQL is in a down-trend (price below both its 50- and 200-day averages), trading -76.2% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is -43.0%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
What's missing and why: we can't build a DCF for PSQL because the data source doesn't reliably provide book value. We would rather say so plainly than manufacture a precise-looking number from nothing. As coverage improves, or for larger and more widely-followed listings, a full intrinsic-value model becomes possible.
PSQL vs peers
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
| Multiple | PSQL | Peer median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/S | 52.6× | 11.8× | richer than |
What does Pasqal Holding SA do?
What does it do?
Pasqal Holding SA develops neutral-atom quantum computers and provides a full-stack quantum computing platform. The company designs and manufactures quantum processors based on neutral-atom technology and integrates them with high-performance computing environments for hybrid quantum computing applications. It operates in the Computer Hardware industry (Technology sector), headquartered in France.
How does it make money?
The business turns $24M in annual revenue into profit. Out of every $100 of sales, about $0 is left as operating profit (operating margin of -213.3%), after a 61% gross margin on the products/services it sells. After all costs, taxes and interest, 0.0% of revenue becomes bottom-line net profit.
Is it financially healthy?
Financially it looks stretched: may struggle to cover its short-term bills (0.7× current ratio), and is currently lossmaking.
Who at PSQL filed insider trades?
| Date | Insider | Relationship | What happened | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bpifrance Investissement S.A.S. | Director | Other acquisition/disposition | — | Form 4 for Bpifrance Investissement S.A.S. (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Bpifrance Investissement S.A.S. | Director | Other acquisition/disposition | — | Form 4 for Bpifrance Investissement S.A.S. (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Gundlach Andrew | Director | Other acquisition/disposition | — | Form 4 for Gundlach Andrew (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Gundlach Andrew | Director | Other acquisition/disposition | — | Form 4 for Gundlach Andrew (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Combes Michel | Director | Other acquisition/disposition | — | Form 4 for Combes Michel (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Reymond Georges-Olivier | Director, 10% owner | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Reymond Georges-Olivier (opens sec.gov in a new tab) |
A disclosure, not a signal to trade. Source: SEC EDGAR (Form 4). Older filings and the 90-day buying-and-selling read are part of Pro. See plans
Companies we do put a number on
Not investment advice. TickerWorth Score is a model output.
A descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is not a licensed investment adviser, and these figures are estimates from public market data that can be wrong, stale or incomplete.