RED.MC · rate-regulated utility · book-value and yield view
Redeia Corporación, S.A. (RED.MC): Valuation Snapshot
Redeia Corporación, S.A. (RED.MC) is a rate-regulated utility, and a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong lens for one, so TickerWorth does not publish a DCF fair value for it. What its filings and market data do show is below. Snapshot as of Oct 19, 2026.
Model by Miraaj Patel · generated from public market data · Updated Oct 19, 2026 · How these pages are made
Why is there no fair value for RED.MC?
This is a rate-regulated utility. Its returns are set by a regulator on an approved rate base rather than won in a market, so a free-cash-flow DCF is the wrong lens — heavy ongoing capex is the business model, not a cash-flow problem. We show the regulated-asset lenses — book value, earnings and dividend — instead.
What is RED.MC's TickerWorth Score?
Middle of the pack — real strengths and real weaknesses
Compared with Utilities companies in Europe
Its strongest point: a profitable, high-quality business. Its weakest: recent price trend has been weak.
- Value · 47 of 100
Cheaper than 47% of Utilities companies in Europe
- Price vs worth · 57 of 100
- Quality · 70 of 100
More profitable than 70% of Utilities companies in Europe
- Financial health · 61 of 100
Financially stronger than 61% of Utilities companies in Europe
- Growth · 43 of 100
Growing faster than 43% of Utilities companies in Europe
- Momentum · 0 of 100
Outperformed almost none of the Utilities companies in Europe over the past year
Confidence: High confidence · Scored
Get the Undervalued Company of the Week.
- Price
- €14.54
- Market cap
- €7,
845, 724, 672 - 52-week high
- €17.68
- 52-week low
- €14.15
- Currency
- EUR
- Exchange
- MCE
Snapshot of Oct 19, 2026, quote time not published · Prices are delayed.
What we can say
Redeia Corporación, S.A. (RED.MC) is a rate-regulated utility, and a free-cash-flow discounted-cash-flow (DCF) model is structurally the wrong lens for one. Its returns are not won in a market — a regulator sets them on an approved rate base — and the heavy, permanent capital spending that depresses its free cash flow is the business model rather than a problem with it.
Read the full reasoning
We have the data to print a DCF number for RED.MC; we don't publish one because the model's assumptions don't describe how this company actually earns. What follows is the lenses that do — descriptive, not a valuation, and not investment advice.
On the numbers we do have, RED.MC trades at a recent price of €14.54, a market capitalisation of about €7,845,724,672, sitting 11% of the way up its 52-week range (€14.15–€17.68), on the MCE.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing RED.MC's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives P/E of 16.3× (cheaper than the peer median of 22.0×); Fwd P/E of 15.1× (cheaper than the peer median of 18.2×); P/B of 1.4× (cheaper than the peer median of 2.2×); P/S of 4.4× (richer than the peer median of 3.1×); EV/EBITDA of 12.0× (cheaper than the peer median of 13.7×); Dividend yield of 5.5% (cheaper than the peer median of 3.3%). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. RED.MC shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 1.37 and book value of €10.60 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. RED.MC is in a down-trend (price below both its 50- and 200-day averages), trading -17.8% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is -11.5%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
To be exact about what this page is not: we are not saying the numbers for RED.MC are unavailable. They are, and they are above. We are saying a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong instrument for this kind of business, and publishing one anyway — because the inputs happen to exist — would be a precise answer to the wrong question. Refusing is the more useful answer, and it is the same rule we apply to every name in this category.
RED.MC vs peers
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
| Multiple | RED.MC | Peer median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 16.3× | 22.0× | cheaper than |
| Fwd P/E | 15.1× | 18.2× | cheaper than |
| P/B | 1.4× | 2.2× | cheaper than |
| P/S | 4.4× | 3.1× | richer than |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.0× | 13.7× | cheaper than |
| Dividend yield | 5.5% | 3.3% | cheaper than |
What does Redeia Corporación, S.A. do?
What does it do?
Redeia Corporación, S.A., through with its subsidiaries, engages in the management of the Spanish electricity transport network in Spain and internationally. The company operates through three segments: Management and Operation of Domestic Electricity Infrastructure; Management and Operation of International Electricity Infrastructure; and Telecommunications. It operates in the Utilities - Regulated Electric industry (Utilities sector), headquartered in Spain. The company employs roughly 2,114 people.
How does it make money?
The business turns 1.8B in annual revenue into profit. Out of every $100 of sales, about $31 is left as operating profit (operating margin of 30.6%), after a 98% gross margin on the products/services it sells. After all costs, taxes and interest, 28.8% of revenue becomes bottom-line net profit.
Is it financially healthy?
Financially it looks stretched: carries moderate debt (1.0× equity), can just cover its short-term bills (1.2× current ratio), and is currently profitable.
RED.MC insider trading
Insider filings are available for US-listed companies only.
Companies we do put a number on
Not investment advice. TickerWorth Score is a model output.
A descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is not a licensed investment adviser, and these figures are estimates from public market data that can be wrong, stale or incomplete.