TEAM · available-data snapshot
Atlassian Corporation (TEAM): Available-Data Snapshot
TickerWorth does not publish a DCF fair value for Atlassian Corporation (TEAM); the reason is set out below. What its filings and market data do show is below. The snapshot also sets out its trading multiples against 5 peers. Snapshot as of Oct 19, 2026.
Model by Miraaj Patel · generated from public market data · Updated Oct 19, 2026 · How these pages are made
Why is there no fair value for TEAM?
We do not publish a fair value for Atlassian Corporation. What we can say from its filings and market data is below.
What is TEAM's TickerWorth Score?
Scores lower than most companies we compare it with
Compared with Technology companies in US
Its strongest point: recent price trend has been strong. Its weakest: looks expensive on the numbers.
- Value · 25 of 100
Cheaper than 25% of Technology companies in US
- Price vs worth · 14 of 100
- Quality · 45 of 100
More profitable than 45% of Technology companies in US
- Financial health · 37 of 100
Financially stronger than 37% of Technology companies in US
- Growth · 63 of 100
Growing faster than 63% of Technology companies in US
- Momentum · 86 of 100
Outperformed 86% of Technology companies in US over the past year
Confidence: Medium confidence · Scored
Get the Undervalued Company of the Week.
- Price
- $210.23
- Market cap
- $53,
217, 374, 208 - 52-week high
- $223.70
- 52-week low
- $56.01
- Currency
- USD
- Exchange
- NasdaqGS
Snapshot of Oct 19, 2026, quote time not published · Prices are delayed.
What we can say
We don't publish a discounted-cash-flow fair value for Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) because the free data sources we rely on don't expose the multi-year financials a DCF needs — common for small or thinly-covered listings. Rather than invent numbers, this page shows an honest snapshot of what the public data does support: the current price and size, any relative valuation multiples that exist, a book-value view, and a price-based read. Treat it as a descriptive starting point, not a valuation and not investment advice.
Read the full reasoning
On the numbers we do have, TEAM trades at a recent price of $210.23, a market capitalisation of about $53,217,374,208, sitting 92% of the way up its 52-week range ($56.01–$223.70), on the NasdaqGS.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing TEAM's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives Fwd P/E of 31.2× (richer than the peer median of 17.0×); P/B of 50.3× (richer than the peer median of 15.7×); P/S of 8.1× (cheaper than the peer median of 11.8×); EV/EBITDA of 120.5× (richer than the peer median of 25.5×). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. TEAM shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 50.33 and book value of $4.18 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. TEAM is in an up-trend (price above both its 50- and 200-day averages), trading -6.0% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is +30.9%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
TEAM vs peers
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
| Multiple | TEAM | Peer median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fwd P/E | 31.2× | 17.0× | richer than |
| P/B | 50.3× | 15.7× | richer than |
| P/S | 8.1× | 11.8× | cheaper than |
| EV/EBITDA | 120.5× | 25.5× | richer than |
What does Atlassian Corporation do?
What does it do?
Atlassian Corporation provides a collaboration software that enables organizations to connect all teams through a system of work that unlocks productivity at scale worldwide. The company's product portfolio includes Jira, Confluence, Loom, Jira Service Management, Rovo, Bitbucket, Compass, Jira Product Discovery, Focus, Talent, Trello, and Guard. It operates in the Software - Application industry (Technology sector), headquartered in Australia. The company employs roughly 13,301 people.
How does it make money?
The business turns $6.6B in annual revenue into profit. Out of every $100 of sales, about $12 is left as operating profit (operating margin of 12.3%), after a 86% gross margin on the products/services it sells. After all costs, taxes and interest, -0.8% of revenue becomes bottom-line net profit.
Is it financially healthy?
Financially it looks mixed: carries moderate debt (1.2× equity), may struggle to cover its short-term bills (0.8× current ratio), and is currently lossmaking.
Who at TEAM filed insider trades?
| Date | Insider | Relationship | What happened | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIU GENE | Chief Accounting Officer | Open-market sale | $70,770.00 | Form 4 for LIU GENE (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| DUFFY BRIAN | Chief Revenue Officer | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for DUFFY BRIAN (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| CHUONG JAMES | Chief Financial Officer | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for CHUONG JAMES (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| LIU GENE | Chief Accounting Officer | Open-market sale | $178,410.00 | Form 4 for LIU GENE (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| CHUONG JAMES | Chief Financial Officer | Open-market sale | $18,195.03 | Form 4 for CHUONG JAMES (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| CHUONG JAMES | Chief Financial Officer | Open-market sale | $371,035.81 | Form 4 for CHUONG JAMES (opens sec.gov in a new tab) |
A disclosure, not a signal to trade. Source: SEC EDGAR (Form 4). Older filings and the 90-day buying-and-selling read are part of Pro. See plans
Companies we do put a number on
Not investment advice. TickerWorth Score is a model output.
A descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is not a licensed investment adviser, and these figures are estimates from public market data that can be wrong, stale or incomplete.