UA · available-data snapshot
Under Armour, Inc. (UA): Available-Data Snapshot
TickerWorth does not publish a DCF fair value for Under Armour, Inc. (UA); the reason is set out below. What its filings and market data do show is below. The snapshot also sets out its trading multiples against 5 peers. Snapshot as of Oct 19, 2026.
Model by Miraaj Patel · generated from public market data · Updated Oct 19, 2026 · How these pages are made
Why is there no fair value for UA?
We do not publish a fair value for Under Armour, Inc.. What we can say from its filings and market data is below.
What is UA's TickerWorth Score?
A weaker business than most companies
Compared with Consumer Cyclical companies in US
Its strongest point: looks cheap on the numbers. Its weakest: profitability is weak.
- Value · 66 of 100
Cheaper than 66% of Consumer Cyclical companies in US
- Price vs worth · 63 of 100
- Quality · 20 of 100
More profitable than 20% of Consumer Cyclical companies in US
- Financial health · 47 of 100
Financially stronger than 47% of Consumer Cyclical companies in US
- Growth · 12 of 100
Growing faster than 12% of Consumer Cyclical companies in US
- Momentum · 32 of 100
Outperformed 32% of Consumer Cyclical companies in US over the past year
Confidence: Medium confidence · Scored
Get the Undervalued Company of the Week.
- Price
- $4.63
- Market cap
- $1,
988, 795, 904 - 52-week high
- $7.91
- 52-week low
- $3.95
- Currency
- USD
- Exchange
- NYSE
Snapshot of Oct 19, 2026, quote time not published · Prices are delayed.
What we can say
We don't publish a discounted-cash-flow fair value for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) because the free data sources we rely on don't expose the multi-year financials a DCF needs — common for small or thinly-covered listings. Rather than invent numbers, this page shows an honest snapshot of what the public data does support: the current price and size, any relative valuation multiples that exist, a book-value view, and a price-based read. Treat it as a descriptive starting point, not a valuation and not investment advice.
Read the full reasoning
On the numbers we do have, UA trades at a recent price of $4.63, a market capitalisation of about $1,988,795,904, sitting 17% of the way up its 52-week range ($3.95–$7.91), on the NYSE.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing UA's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives Fwd P/E of 12.2× (cheaper than the peer median of 23.3×); P/B of 1.4× (cheaper than the peer median of 10.5×); P/S of 0.4× (cheaper than the peer median of 3.5×); EV/EBITDA of 17.2× (richer than the peer median of 15.1×). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. UA shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 1.39 and book value of $3.33 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. UA is in a down-trend (price below both its 50- and 200-day averages), trading -41.4% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is +1.3%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
UA vs peers
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
| Multiple | UA | Peer median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fwd P/E | 12.2× | 23.3× | cheaper than |
| P/B | 1.4× | 10.5× | cheaper than |
| P/S | 0.4× | 3.5× | cheaper than |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.2× | 15.1× | richer than |
What does Under Armour, Inc. do?
What does it do?
Under Armour, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in designing, developing, marketing, and distributing performance apparel, footwear, and accessories for men, women, and youth. The company provides its apparel in compression, fitted, and loose fit types. It operates in the Apparel Manufacturing industry (Consumer Cyclical sector), headquartered in United States. The company employs roughly 6,200 people.
How does it make money?
The business turns $4.9B in annual revenue into profit. Out of every $100 of sales, about $0 is left as operating profit (operating margin of -1.6%), after a 46% gross margin on the products/services it sells. After all costs, taxes and interest, -10.0% of revenue becomes bottom-line net profit.
Is it financially healthy?
Financially it looks mixed: carries modest debt (1.0× equity), comfortably covers its short-term bills (1.8× current ratio), and is currently lossmaking.
Who at UA filed insider trades?
| Date | Insider | Relationship | What happened | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whitesell Patrick | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Whitesell Patrick (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Sweeney Robert John | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Sweeney Robert John (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Gibbs David W | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Gibbs David W (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Fitzpatrick Dawn N. | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Fitzpatrick Dawn N. (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Everson Carolyn | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Everson Carolyn (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| El-Erian Mohamed | Director | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for El-Erian Mohamed (opens sec.gov in a new tab) |
A disclosure, not a signal to trade. Source: SEC EDGAR (Form 4). Older filings and the 90-day buying-and-selling read are part of Pro. See plans
Companies we do put a number on
Not investment advice. TickerWorth Score is a model output.
A descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is not a licensed investment adviser, and these figures are estimates from public market data that can be wrong, stale or incomplete.