TickerWorth Open the interactive view →

UniCredit S.p.A. (UCG.MI) — Valuation Snapshot

Updated Sep 3, 2026 · bank / insurer · relative-multiples view · descriptive, not a DCF, not advice

This is a bank / insurer / financial. A free-cash-flow DCF is structurally the wrong lens here (their debt and float are raw material, not financing), so we value it on relative multiples — price-to-book and price-to-earnings — instead.
Price
€83.62
Market cap
€125,285,957,632
52-week high
€86.42
52-week low
€57.36
Currency
EUR
Exchange
Milan

UniCredit S.p.A. (UCG.MI) is a bank, insurer or other financial, and a free-cash-flow discounted-cash-flow (DCF) model is structurally the wrong lens for it: for these businesses debt and float are raw material, not financing, so there is no meaningful 'free cash flow' to discount. Instead of a misleading intrinsic-value number, this page reads UCG.MI the way financials are actually valued — on relative multiples such as price-to-earnings and, above all, price-to-book — plus a plain description of where the stock trades. It is a descriptive snapshot, not a valuation, and not investment advice.

On the numbers we do have, UCG.MI trades at a recent price of €83.62, a market capitalisation of about €125,285,957,632, sitting 90% of the way up its 52-week range (€57.36–€86.42), on the Milan.

The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing UCG.MI's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives P/E of 11.9× (cheaper than the peer median of 15.5×); Fwd P/E of 10.0× (cheaper than the peer median of 14.2×); P/B of 1.8× (cheaper than the peer median of 2.8×); P/S of 5.0× (in line with the peer median of 5.1×); Dividend yield of 3.8% (cheaper than the peer median of 1.7%). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.

The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. UCG.MI shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 1.78 and book value of €47.00 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.

Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. UCG.MI is in an up-trend (price above both its 50- and 200-day averages), trading -3.2% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is +26.6%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.

To be exact about what this page is not: we are not saying the numbers for UCG.MI are unavailable. They are, and they are above. We are saying a discounted-cash-flow model is the wrong instrument for this kind of business, and publishing one anyway — because the inputs happen to exist — would be a precise answer to the wrong question. Refusing is the more useful answer, and it is the same rule we apply to every name in this category.

Relative valuation — UCG.MI vs peers

MultipleUCG.MIPeer median
P/E11.9×15.5×cheaper than
Fwd P/E10.0×14.2×cheaper than
P/B1.8×2.8×cheaper than
P/S5.0×5.1×in line with
Dividend yield3.8%1.7%cheaper than

Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).

Asset / book-value view

Price / book (P/B)
1.78
Book value / share
€47.00

Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share. Most useful for asset-heavy businesses, banks and insurers.

Price-based snapshot

50-day avg
€82.32
200-day avg
€72.82
From 52-wk high
-3.2%
1-year momentum
+26.6%

Price-based, not a valuation. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded — they say nothing about fair value.

Explore more

Most undervalued stocks (per our valuation) · All valued stocks · Interactive UCG.MI view

A descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is an educational tool, not a licensed investment adviser. Figures are estimates derived from public market data and can be wrong, stale or incomplete.