ZG · available-data snapshot
Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG): Available-Data Snapshot
TickerWorth does not publish a DCF fair value for Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG); the reason is set out below. What its filings and market data do show is below. The snapshot also sets out its trading multiples against 5 peers. Snapshot as of Oct 19, 2026.
Model by Miraaj Patel · generated from public market data · Updated Oct 19, 2026 · How these pages are made
Why is there no fair value for ZG?
We do not publish a fair value for Zillow Group, Inc.. What we can say from its filings and market data is below.
What is ZG's TickerWorth Score?
Middle of the pack — real strengths and real weaknesses
Compared with Communication Services companies in US
Its strongest point: growing quickly. Its weakest: looks expensive on the numbers.
- Value · 32 of 100
Cheaper than 32% of Communication Services companies in US
- Price vs worth · 83 of 100
- Quality · 38 of 100
More profitable than 38% of Communication Services companies in US
- Financial health · 80 of 100
Financially stronger than 80% of Communication Services companies in US
- Growth · 85 of 100
Growing faster than 85% of Communication Services companies in US
- Momentum · 9 of 100
Outperformed 9% of Communication Services companies in US over the past year
Confidence: Medium confidence · Scored
Get the Undervalued Company of the Week.
- Price
- $31.39
- Market cap
- $7,
058, 824, 704 - 52-week high
- $76.32
- 52-week low
- $27.25
- Currency
- USD
- Exchange
- NasdaqGS
Snapshot of Oct 19, 2026, quote time not published · Prices are delayed.
What we can say
We don't publish a discounted-cash-flow fair value for Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG) because the free data sources we rely on don't expose the multi-year financials a DCF needs — common for small or thinly-covered listings. Rather than invent numbers, this page shows an honest snapshot of what the public data does support: the current price and size, any relative valuation multiples that exist, a book-value view, and a price-based read. Treat it as a descriptive starting point, not a valuation and not investment advice.
Read the full reasoning
On the numbers we do have, ZG trades at a recent price of $31.39, a market capitalisation of about $7,058,824,704, sitting 8% of the way up its 52-week range ($27.25–$76.32), on the NasdaqGS.
The standard alternative to a DCF is relative valuation — comparing ZG's trading multiples against a sector benchmark. Here that gives P/E of 136.5× (richer than the peer median of 22.2×); Fwd P/E of 10.6× (cheaper than the peer median of 18.6×); P/B of 1.6× (cheaper than the peer median of 6.7×); P/S of 2.5× (cheaper than the peer median of 6.1×); EV/EBITDA of 40.2× (richer than the peer median of 16.7×). A cheaper multiple than peers can flag a discount or a market that expects weaker growth; it is a comparison, not a recommendation.
The asset, or book-value, lens is the classic tool for asset-heavy businesses and financials. ZG shows a price-to-book (P/B) of 1.64 and book value of $19.16 per share. Price-to-book compares the market price to the accounting net-asset value per share; below 1.0 can mean a discount to net assets or that the market is pricing in trouble — descriptive either way, never a buy signal on its own.
Finally, a price-based read — explicitly not a valuation. ZG is in a down-trend (price below both its 50- and 200-day averages), trading -58.9% from its 52-week high. Over the past year the stock is -55.4%. Moving-average trend and 52-week position describe where the stock has traded; they say nothing about what it is worth.
ZG vs peers
Sector benchmark (bellwethers, not direct competitors).
| Multiple | ZG | Peer median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 136.5× | 22.2× | richer than |
| Fwd P/E | 10.6× | 18.6× | cheaper than |
| P/B | 1.6× | 6.7× | cheaper than |
| P/S | 2.5× | 6.1× | cheaper than |
| EV/EBITDA | 40.2× | 16.7× | richer than |
What does Zillow Group, Inc. do?
What does it do?
Zillow Group, Inc. operates a real estate application and website that connects consumers with technology, agents and loan officers, and digital solutions in the United States. It operates in the Internet Content & Information industry (Communication Services sector), headquartered in United States. The company employs roughly 7,232 people.
How does it make money?
The business turns $2.8B in annual revenue into profit. Out of every $100 of sales, about $5 is left as operating profit (operating margin of 4.7%), after a 73% gross margin on the products/services it sells. After all costs, taxes and interest, 2.0% of revenue becomes bottom-line net profit.
Is it financially healthy?
Financially it looks solid: carries modest debt (0.1× equity), comfortably covers its short-term bills (1.9× current ratio), and is currently profitable.
Who at ZG filed insider trades?
| Date | Insider | Relationship | What happened | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tremblay Rikki | VP, Principal Acctg. Officer | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Tremblay Rikki (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| BLACHFORD ERIK C | Director | Open-market sale | $28,282.32 | Form 4 for BLACHFORD ERIK C (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Cormier Thielke Claire | Director | Open-market sale | $42,387.77 | Form 4 for Cormier Thielke Claire (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Knight Cassandra | Chief Legal and Policy Officer | Grant / award | — | Form 4 for Knight Cassandra (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Hofmann Jeremy | COO & CFO | Open-market sale | $193,478.83 | Form 4 for Hofmann Jeremy (opens sec.gov in a new tab) | |
| Wacksman Jeremy | Director, Chief Executive Officer | Open-market sale | $319,176.20 | Form 4 for Wacksman Jeremy (opens sec.gov in a new tab) |
A disclosure, not a signal to trade. Source: SEC EDGAR (Form 4). Older filings and the 90-day buying-and-selling read are part of Pro. See plans
Companies we do put a number on
Not investment advice. TickerWorth Score is a model output.
A descriptive, available-data snapshot and relative comparison — NOT a DCF, NOT a price target, and NOT investment advice. TickerWorth is not a licensed investment adviser, and these figures are estimates from public market data that can be wrong, stale or incomplete.